The basic rule for a package is to have its options named
after the package name. There is no reason this should not
also be the case for virtual packages.
Besides, this will allow us to switch luainterpreter to use the
soon-to-be-introduced virtual-package infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
Cc: Francois Perrad <fperrad@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This patch introduces the luainterpreter virtual package, which
is provided either by 'lua' or by 'lua-jit'.
Packages that require a Lua interpreter can then depend on
BR2_PACKAGE_LUAINTERPRETER (in their Config.in) and luainterpreter
(in their .mk).
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: switch to package-defined providers,
apply Thomas' comments]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
The Lua website says:
"Like most names, it should be written in lower case with an initial capital,
that is, "Lua". Please do not write it as "LUA", which is both ugly and
confusing, because then it becomes an acronym with different meanings for
different people."
http://www.lua.org/about.html
So, let's honor this request in buildroot.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Closes#803
Based on initial patch by rvpaasen@t3i.nl
[Peter: lua/luac needs liblua.so.* on target]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>