gitolite/buildrootschalter
gitolite
/
buildrootschalter
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
buildrootschalter/package/exfat/Config.in

18 lines
625 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

exfat: new package Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2013-02-05 01:48:03 +01:00
config BR2_PACKAGE_EXFAT
bool "exFAT (FUSE)"
depends on BR2_LARGEFILE # libfuse
depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS # libfuse
depends on BR2_USE_MMU # libfuse
depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
exfat: doesn't work on static builds because of libfuse Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2013-02-26 01:18:36 +01:00
depends on !BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB # libfuse
exfat: new package Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2013-02-05 01:48:03 +01:00
select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBFUSE
help
A full-featured exFAT file system implementation for GNU/Linux
and other Unix-like systems as a FUSE module.
http://code.google.com/p/exfat/
Config.in files: unify comments of toolchain option dependencies This patch lines up the comments in Config.in files that clarify which toolchain options the package depends on. Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-10-13 16:55:32 +02:00
comment "exfat needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar, threads, dynamic library"
Config.in files: add missing dependencies to toolchain option comments When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B. For example: config BR2_PACKAGE_A depends on BR2_B depends on BR2_LARGEFILE depends on BR2_WCHAR comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR This comment should actually be: comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on BR2_B depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that same Config.in file): if BR2_B comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR [other config options depending on B] endif Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies are not met. This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such dependencies from depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC to depends on BR2_BASE_DEP depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative) toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments (because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions. Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> (untested) Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-11-07 09:24:37 +01:00
depends on BR2_USE_MMU
exfat: doesn't work on static builds because of libfuse Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2013-02-26 01:18:36 +01:00
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS || !BR2_USE_WCHAR || BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB